Milgram's shock machine
Milgram with his fake machine

  The September 27th issue of Science contains a review by Ruud Abma, a social scientist, of the above book, subtitled, The Untold Story of the Notorious Milgram Psychology Experiments.[stextbox id=”custom” color=”000033″ bcolor=”adff2f” bgcolor=”dcdcdc” image=”null”] It is August, 1961. While the “learner” in the next room is begging him to stop, the person filling the role of “teacher” is urged by a stern-looking scientist to keep testing and, if the answer is wrong, administering electric shocks. The teacher had been told that the experiment addressed the effect of punishment on learning, but, in reality it was about obedience: with each wrong answer, on the memory test, teachers [the real subjects] Stanley Milgramwere to increase the voltage. How far would people go? Far, it appeared: 65% of the teachers continued to the possibly deadly level of 450 volts. (In reality, of course, no shocks were given.) [/stextbox]The real scientist was Stanley Milgram who claimed that he had discovered a “universal truth about human nature that explained the obedience to Nazi officials and Adolph Hitlier: in the face of authority, human conscience is frail.” The book documents that Milgram had deliberately designed the experiment to prove his point, initially finding that the subjects complied in direct relation to the degree of pressure placed on them, that many of them assumed that the whole thing was a pretense (with that comically overdone faux shock machine), and that Milgram himself privately admitted that the experiments were “merely effective theater.”

Prophesy of Isaiah

Nevertheless, I believe that obedience to the authority of groups is indeed at the center of human nature. For two million years, the brains of our pre-human ancestral species expanded in order to synchronize the behavior of 20-30 individuals for-the-good-of-their-groups. This is how selection at the level of groups works. There are two factors, however, that were intrinsic to the obedience of these ancestors to the authority residing in the spiritual sphere of their groups. The first is that these groups were naturally selected not in competition with one another, but according to their relative productivity. Secondly, these ancestral groups were non-hierarchical: their authority was very simply the-good-of-their-groups, and so, intrinsic to this authority, which we have inherited, was and is morality and justice.

Lincolns' passivity to the Will of God

The fate of our Homo sapiens species is that the authority for-the-good-of-the-group has been usurped by evil individuals like Adolph Hitler and P.T.Barnum want-to-be’s like Stanley Milgram. However, it is our special destiny to live out the true meaning of our deepest nature: in the absence of morality and justice, authority is preordained to fall by the wayside due, if for no other reason, to the failure of its productivity. I cannot refrain from, once again, repeating President Lincoln’s assessment of the source of authority that was afield in our own Civil War.

[stextbox id=”custom” color=”000000″ bcolor=”dc143c” bgcolor=”fdf5e6″ image=”null”]If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”

Tags: , ,

2 Comments on “Briefly Noted: “Behind the Shock Machine” by Gina Perry”

  1. Thank you, John. This makes so much sense. I have always been kind of suspicious of the Milgram hoopla and “findings.” So many ways it is, at best, artificial and manipulated, as well as subject to erroneous interpretation.

  2. Thank you for you comment, Richard. Milgram is part of the scientific agenda of chopping up human behavior into little pieces, selecting the most self-interested, cynical parts, and saying, “See, you are not as good as you think you are.” Its is like lifting sex out of the rich complexity of romance and saying that is all there is to that. Because science has come up with smart phones, and stuff like that, people cede them authority in the area of human nature of which they understand very little. If you want to know about human nature, you would be better off reading some great literature. But, of course, you already know that, Richard.

Comments are closed.