I must confess that there have been occasions when I have been temporarily drawn from my role as physician into stunned fascination by the linguistic performance of a patient in the throes of a manic illness. All manner of rhetorical flourishes and beautifully constructed phrases can pour out in a torrent. Often there is a magnetic quality to this verbal virtuosity, the meaning (semantics) of which can constitute a brilliantly creative flight of ideas. Beyond the grammar and meaning, the sheer musicality of it can elicit rapt fascination. In the biography by Sylvia Nasar of the mathematician John Nash, A Beautiful Mind: The Life of Mathematical Genius and Nobel Laureate John Nash (1998), a visitor relates the following incident at the McLean Psychiatric Hospital in Boston, where Nash was hospitalized for schizophrenia:

Robert Lowell, the poet, walked in, manic as hell. He sees this very pregnant woman. He looks at her and starts quoting the begat sequences in the Bible. Then he started spinning quotes with the word “anointed.” He decided to lecture us on the meaning of “anointed” in all the ways it was used in the King James Version of the Bible. In the end I decided that every word in the English language was a personal friend of his. [p. 260 (Simon & Schuster edition)]

A Beautiful Mind -Nassar
Dating a fossil

Vital to dating a fossil is careful evaluation of the surrounding geologic strata in which the fossil is found. The extraordinary hyperactivity of the intricately complex structure (syntax) of spoken language is one of the most central and dramatic behavioral manifestations in mania and is the equivalent of such a stratum.

Linguists are chronically irritated by amateurs like me impinging on their highly specialized field, particularly when it comes to evolution. For that reason, my forays into language are closely chaperoned by recognized authorities. The first generalization is that the syntactical (grammatical) aspect of language is complex and cognitively demanding. Therefore, as Ray Jackendoff, a prominent linguist at Tufts University, puts it in his Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution (2002, p. 427), syntax “has the feel of a relatively late innovation,” that is, a recent evolutionary development.

As I have blogged before, prior hominid species almost certainly had robustly expressive language that involved the sharing of their collective intentions, which set them well apart from all other primates. But it is the byzantine complexity of linguistic grammar that has propelled us into another sphere. It is my conviction that the verbal, syntactic gymnastics that regularly accompany mania fix the disorder as deriving from a suite of normal behaviors that were the principal adaptations in the evolution of Homo sapiens.

There is also a link between vocal language and the idea that the evolution of Homo sapiens involved sexual selection. In The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871), Darwin associated the concept of sexual selection with vocal language in human evolution. Drawing on the example in nature of male birdsong, Darwin wrote:

The impassioned orator, bard, or musician, when with his various tones and cadences, he excites the strongest emotions in his hearers, little suspects that he uses the same means by which, at an extremely remote period, his half-human ancestors aroused each other’s passions, during their mutual courtship and rivalry.

Descent of Man -Darwin

In his erudite yet wonderfully readable book The Evolution of Language (2010), linguist W. Tecumseh Fitch supports the association between the origin of human language and song:

The core virtue of the musical protolanguage hypothesis is its logical explanation of the design features shared by song and spoken language, namely the use of the vocal/auditory channel to generate complex, hierarchically structured signals that are learned and shared across generations.

Evolutionof Language -Fitch

Darwin’s original idea of associating vocal language with sexual selection remains very much alive and well today. For example, think back to when you were going through puberty, at the peak of your sexuality, how utterly enraptured you were with popular music.

WHAT HOMO SAPIENS BRINGS TO THE 6-MILLION YEAR HOMINID TABLE
What I’m telling you is that this sort of thing is in our DNA.
(sorry)

Tags: , ,

4 Comments on “THE DESIRES THAT BREAK LOOSE IN MANIA DEFINE OUR OWN HOMO SAPIENS SPECIES”

  1. John, I define knowledge as representations of reality. For example, you have a name (a reality), and that name can be identified by various representations, e.g., you can tell me your name; you can have a label of on your jacket stating your name; I can ask someone who you are, and that person can say, “His name is John.” One element of reality, with various representations of it. I distinguish between four basic types of reality: physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. (Harrari, the author of “Sapiens,” in his book “Homo Deus” identifies the first three of these realities, though using different labels for them.) I also identify a fifth type of reality–representations themselves. Linguists, for example, study the nature and characteristics of language; art critics study the nature and characteristics of visual representations; and so forth. Perhaps individuals in a manic state detach from physical, social, and psychological realities and fall into representational reality–uttering words for their own sake rather than as a way to represent some element of reality. It has been hypothesized that art and madness are associated. Perhaps some artists become enamored with their medium of representation (e.g., paintbrushes, paint, and canvases) and lose contact with other realities.

    1. Mark, This helps me: “ I define knowledge as representations of reality. For example, you have a name (a reality), and that name can be identified by various representations, e.g., you can tell me your name; you can have a label of on your jacket stating your name; I can ask someone who you are, and that person can say, ‘His name is John.’”
      —————
      The above helps me put my ideas about human self-awareness in your context, because my basic theory is that we have two consciousness: one private consciousness having to do with the personal desires that are exaggerated in mania (this post) and one collective consciousness that has to do with the codes and values of one’s nested groups. The fact that we have these two representations of reality—one from the individual’s point of view and one from the p.o.v. of our groups makes it possible for us to “know” that we are conscious, a.k.a. self-aware.
      Benjamin Libet performed a classic experiment on free will titled “Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action” (1985). He recorded the exact time at which subjects consciously made the decision to move a finger at a moment of their own choosing. An electroencephalogram monitoring brain activity revealed unconscious activity that Libet called “readiness potential” an average of one half second before participants were aware of their decision to move. In other words, before a person is aware of deciding to act, preparation for the action has already been initiated in the brain.
      This half-second delay is explained by the proposition that our 300,000-year-old Homo sapiens individual consciousness only becomes self-aware in the act of experiencing itself from the underlying platform of our six-million-year-old collective consciousness. The decision is made freely by the individual mind but must await its conscious registration in the collective mind before knowledge (awareness) of the conscious decision is attained and reported.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: